Selim Turan's Unhappy Patients

Patient 1

A patient shared a serious warning about their experience with Dr. Selim Turan, describing it as being botched. They originally went in to correct a deviated septum, only to come out of surgery with the same issue and additional complications. During a post-op cleaning about a week after surgery, a nurse used clamps that tore open their alar stitches, causing intense pain. The patient reported this to Dr. Turan, who scolded the nurse but refused to restitch the area. Once home, the wound reopened entirely, forcing the patient to seek emergency care where a local nurse had to perform new stitches. This resulted in scarring and broken blood vessels on one side of the nose.

The patient also reported poor hygiene and handling immediately after surgery. They described intense shaking from cold, bloody and unclean stitches, and the premature application of creams and rinses just hours after surgery. These practices were later revealed to be improper when compared to the more professional and sanitary care they received from a new surgeon. They were also left with a visible bump on the nasal bridge, which was dismissed by Dr. Turan at cast removal but remained a year later. The final result, including an elongated bridge, low tip, and uneven nostrils, looked nothing like the simulation they were promised.

Attempts to receive a refund were denied, and the patient felt the entire experience was rushed, cheap, and deeply unprofessional. They expressed frustration that Dr. Turan operates on multiple patients per day and that their case felt like it was handled in a factory-like manner. After undergoing a successful revision elsewhere, the patient urges others to avoid Dr. Turan, emphasizing how sharing this experience might help prevent others from enduring the same trauma.

Patient 2

At 6 months post-op, this patient is left with severe damage and emotional distress. They initially noticed nostril asymmetry but were told it was just swelling. When they requested surgical photos, they were only sent limited views, despite knowing others existed. Four days after surgery, they developed an infection that was neglected until it caused visible tissue damage, scarring, and a noticeable gap. Later, a second infection formed due to a non-dissolved suture. Their nostrils became increasingly uneven, the columella crooked, and healing was poor.

Feeling they had no other option, the patient returned to Turan for a revision. He performed a nostril reduction on damaged tissue, which made little difference. The stitches reopened within days due to necrosis, and the patient experienced the procedure fully because the anesthesia failed. Despite screaming in pain, the surgeon continued operating and even attempted to straighten the septum with tweezers without anesthesia. He blamed the complications on "bad genetics" rather than taking responsibility. A second nostril reduction was done just one week later on the same inflamed area.

After returning home, the stitches reopened again, and the patient was advised by local doctors not to proceed with further surgery due to the risk of necrosis. They are now left with permanent deformities and an open scar. Initially staying silent due to fear and intimidation, the patient chose to speak out in hopes of helping others avoid the same experience.

Patient 3

One male patient clearly requested only a refined bridge and a 90-degree tip while asking that his ethnic features be preserved. He specifically pleaded with Dr. Turan not to over-project or over-rotate the nose. Despite this, Turan reportedly ignored the patient's requests and took extensive liberties with the procedure. The result included significant over-projection, excessive rotation, and an irreversible alarplasty performed without consent. The patient was left with visible scarring, exacerbated by his ethnicity, along with a feminized nose that lacked harmony with his facial features, asymmetric nostrils, a crooked bridge, and partial collapse of the left nasal valve. The physical outcome has led to psychological distress and multiple rounds of trauma recovery.

To make matters worse, Turan posted the patient's photos on social media without obtaining consent. The comments were largely negative, reflecting the drastic nature of the result. Turan refused to remove the post until the patient began leaving negative reviews. He also reportedly shared private messages from this patient with others in an effort to defend himself.

Patient 4

The patient experienced a range of complications following rhinoplasty with Dr. Turan, resulting in both physical discomfort and emotional distress. Shortly after surgery, the patient reported intense pain that did not respond to standard painkillers, and they expressed concern about the lack of strong medication provided. They also experienced swelling, breathing difficulties, and suspected an infection. Over time, the patient began to feel that their nose appeared crooked, uneven at the tip, and that the nostrils were asymmetrical. Despite repeatedly expressing these concerns, they were often told everything was "normal" without being asked to provide photos or videos for proper assessment.

A few weeks post-op, the patient's discomfort intensified. They reported that the internal sutures appeared to be irritating the tissue, and they were uncertain whether the problem stemmed from swelling or deeper complications. At one point, the patient was informed by a specialist that their nose was "a disaster," describing it as not swollen but structurally crooked with nostril asymmetry. Breathing was still impaired, and the doctor suspected there may be an infection at the nasal tip. Additionally, the patient was told that one of their turbinates had been altered in a way that prevented it from functioning properly, further contributing to the breathing problem.

Emotionally, the patient described feeling overwhelmed, confused, and unsupported. They mentioned inconsistent aftercare instructions between Dr. Turan and his assistants, such as whether to wear the nasal retainer, which left them unsure of what to do. The patient noted that their condition seemed to worsen rather than improve over time, and they expressed fear that the situation might end in collapse. After waiting six years to undergo revision surgery, the patient felt disheartened by the complications.

Patient 5

The patient experienced a cascade of complications and deeply distressing outcomes following multiple procedures performed by Dr. Selim Turan. One of the central complaints was the placement of multiple sharp structural grafts—including a crooked shield graft —in the nasal tip. These grafts resulted in a visibly angular, overly projected tip that extended past the columella. Since the surgery multiple rhinoplasty specialists have confirmed these grafts were poorly suited to the patient's anatomy, particularly given naturally thin skin.

Another major concern was that the patient underwent alarplasty without informed consent. This procedure had not been requested or discussed, and the patient only became aware of it after seeing changes in their post-operative appearance and reviewing surgical documentation. The patient also experienced TWO nasal infections after this surgery. Selim Turan denied that the patient had an infection however the patients local physician was able to confirm the infection instantly and get the patient started on antibiotics to clear the infection.

Finally, the patient was left with a botched upper bleph consisting of atrophic, hypertrophic, and dog ear scars. Multiple oculoplastic surgeons have confirmed that Selim Turan had absolutely no clue what he was doing while performing this bleph. Too much skin was removed on such a young patient and the sutures were the wrong type of sutures to use on such delicate eye skin. The patient also needed punctal plugs inserted because the aggressive skin removal left them with the inability to fully close their eyes and retain enough moisture in the eyes to function on a day to day basis. These complications left the patient initially extremely suicidal, emotionally and physically affected, and they expressed a combination of anger, helplessness, and disbelief. They stated that they would never have allowed Dr. Turan to operate had they known what the outcomes would be, and that it is "the biggest mistake of their life".

Patient 6

The patient experienced multiple complications following rhinoplasty performed by Dr. Turan. At nearly 7 months post-op, they reported dissatisfaction with the appearance of the nasal tip, describing it as unnaturally sharp and asymmetrical, appearing noticeably different from one side to the other. They also noted a prominent supra-tip break, which contributed to an uneven and unintended nasal contour. The patient stated that the nasal tip was rotated without their consent, deviating from the aesthetic goals they had discussed with the surgeon, and noted that the tip grafts were improperly placed, resulting in a crooked and asymmetric appearance. While they acknowledged some aspects of the result were acceptable, the asymmetry, unnatural shape, and unauthorized tip rotation caused persistent frustration.

Concerns also arose regarding a steroid injection administered during recovery. Although the injection was explained as necessary due to thick skin, the patient believed their skin was actually thin, citing their ability to feel bone through the skin even prior to surgery. They also reported being prescribed Accutane in a seemingly haphazard manner. These discrepancies led the patient to question whether the treatment approach was appropriate for their anatomy and whether it may have contributed to the complications they experienced.

In addition to nasal concerns, the patient reported scarring issues. The nose developed uneven healing patterns, with a hypertrophic scar on one side and an atrophic scar on the other. Despite repeatedly reaching out to Dr. Turan’s team, the patient received only generalized reassurances and was consistently told to wait. Over time, the lack of direct engagement led to increasing frustration and a growing sense of neglect in how their outcome was managed.

Patient 7

Patient presented with alarplasty scars that were visible right from the table pic and persisted as hypertrophic scars.

Patient 8 - Direct Quote

Patient 9

One patient described a devastating experience with Dr. Selim Turan, expressing deep disappointment not only in the surgical outcome but also in the doctor’s behavior and lack of accountability. The patient originally sought rhinoplasty to address a mild downward tip movement when smiling. Prior to surgery, her nose was straight and proportional. Despite thoroughly researching reviews, she later discovered that multiple other patients in Istanbul had also experienced complications, raising concerns about underreported negative outcomes.

During the in-person consultation, Dr. Turan attempted to upsell additional facial procedures, which the patient found invasive and unprofessional. After surgery, he showed her initial photos of the result, where she immediately noticed a crooked appearance. Though she had signed a form prohibiting her photos from being shared publicly, she was shocked to see them posted on Dr. Turan’s Instagram the next day. When confronted, he dismissed her concern with the response, “Who’s going to recognize you?”, a remark that left the patient feeling deeply violated and unsafe under his care.

As time went on, the nasal asymmetry worsened. In a follow-up video call, Dr. Turan acknowledged the crookedness and suggested that she massage her nose to “push it straight,” an alarming and medically questionable recommendation. A month later, with no improvement, the patient returned to Istanbul. Rather than see her at his office, Dr. Turan instructed his staff to direct her to a hospital so as not to alarm other patients. He again admitted the deformity, attempted to manually reposition the nose, and then suggested filler injections just one month post-op, something the patient refused given the risk so early post op. Though her contract allowed for refunds in cases of medical negligence, Dr. Turan refused, falsely claiming that “Turkey cannot wire money back.” Instead of offering support, he ended their final call with a mocking thumbs up.

The emotional toll of the experience has been significant. The patient believes many others remain silent, possibly hoping for corrections in future surgeries. She warns others considering cosmetic procedures, especially abroad, that the contracts often protect only the surgeon, not the patient. Her message is clear: if you're looking for a sign to reconsider, this is it.

Patient 10

The patient underwent a rhinoplasty with Dr. Turan that left them highly dissatisfied with both the aesthetic outcome and the follow-up communication. The patient had initially discussed a nose design featuring a slight curve and a more upturned tip.

However, a year after surgery, the patient observed the presence of a hump, a drooping tip, and an overall longer and larger nose, features they explicitly did not request. The final result looked nothing like the simulation that was initially shown. When the patient raised these concerns with Dr. Turan and shared photos, he responded via voice note claiming the current nose matched what was discussed, and even asserted that the patient had asked for the straight design. The patient felt gaslighted by this denial and pointed out that their sister had been present during consultations where a slight curve was agreed upon.

The patient also expressed dissatisfaction with the outcome of the rib scar, which was left open and stitches were sticking out. Concerned inquiries as to why the wound was left open were not answered in messages or in person. The wound healed with a deep scarring, which, according to the surgeon in the patient's hometown, could have been prevented. Later inquiries and concerns about the scar were only answered with "just use scar ex".

The patient also expressed frustration over being offered a revision for €3000, which felt inappropriate given that the original outcome did not reflect the preoperative agreements and the patient was assured in advance that only €1500 hospital fees would be charged in the event of a necessary correction. They emphasized that the issue was not just stylistic preference but a failure to deliver what was promised. Specific complaints included a nose that was longer, straighter, and had a more droopy tip than requested. The patient had previously asked not to make the nose bigger, yet sarcastically noted that the outcome was being blamed on their refusal to “let him do his work,” implying the surgeon had deflected responsibility. They criticized Turan for producing similar nose styles for all patients, regardless of individual anatomy or requests .

Ultimately, the patient decided not to return to Dr. Turan for a revision, referencing a previous experience where repeated revisions with the same surgeon led to worse outcomes, including nasal collapse. They opted to seek care from a different doctor known for a different aesthetic approach. Additionally, the patient was frustrated by extra charges, such as €1500 for rib cartilage, even though rib grafts were already in place from the original surgery. They viewed this as unprofessional and a breach of initial revision agreements, emphasizing that the result was not due to healing complications but unmet surgical expectations.

Patient 11

Patient underwent a revision rhinoplasty with Dr. Selim Turan one year ago and described the overall experience as deeply disappointing. On the day of surgery, the patient was left waiting for three hours, and once called in, the consultation was rushed. Despite having traveled from abroad and feeling unsure, the patient proceeded with the surgery due to the arrangements already in place. Initially, Dr. Turan stated the nose was not complex, but after the results proved unsatisfactory, he later claimed it had been a difficult case. Something a lot of patients complain that he does.

Following surgery, the patient experienced significant swelling, which clinic staff dismissed as an allergic reaction and advised waiting. The final result was a nose with a low-hanging tip and uneven thickness. When the patient raised concerns, Dr. Turan reportedly responded with sarcasm and deflection, prescribing cortisone injections, creams, and medications while blaming the patient’s skin type. One injection led to visible nasal collapse, swelling, and exposed veins. Despite these complications, the doctor recommended additional cortisone and even laser treatment, which the patient found inappropriate given the worsening condition.

Over the course of the year, the patient waited for the swelling to resolve, as instructed, but saw no improvement. At a follow-up, the doctor proposed another surgery, requiring the patient to cover additional hospital fees. The patient ultimately felt that the clinic prioritized profit over care, citing a lack of professionalism, poor communication, and inadequate surgical outcomes. The holes caused by the cortisone injection, according to the patient, left permanent damage that cannot be corrected with another revision. As a result, the patient stated they would never trust Dr. Turan again and strongly cautioned others against choosing him for surgery.

Patient 12

The patient experienced a prolonged and frustrating series of complications following surgery with Dr. Turan. The initial procedure left them dissatisfied with the appearance of the alar base, a visible dent, and a bump. Hoping for a less invasive solution, the patient opted for a non-surgical correction rather than a full revision. However, the correction failed to resolve the concerns, and the results remained unsatisfactory.

Later, the patient returned to Dr. Turan for a second correction, which worsened the scarring without addressing the original issues. During communication with the surgeon, the patient felt dismissed and invalidated. In response to their concerns, Dr. Turan replied with “I tried my best 🙃” followed by an emoji, which the patient interpreted as dismissive. At one point, the surgeon suggested that the patient was overly focused on small details and even implied that the patient had a mental health issue. The patient attempted to present their concerns clearly during a follow-up visit using an iPad, but Dr. Turan reportedly refused to look and responded with anger. His tone only shifted when the patient returned with a family member, at which point he became more respectful, although the outcomes did not improve.

Over time, the patient decided to stop seeking assistance from the clinic. They noted that the 2 year post-op support period had ended, the scars had worsened, and the initial concerns remained unresolved. The patient also became aware that someone had informed the clinic about their comments in another group, which further damaged the relationship. Ultimately, the patient expressed a desire to move on, feeling emotionally drained, unsupported, and disappointed by the lack of accountability and meaningful resolution.

Patient 13

This patient turned to Turan for a revision after being drawn in by the seemingly impressive results on Instagram—many of which, it turns out, were just table shots. His primary surgery had been performed using his own rib by a relatively unknown surgeon, but he was seeking further refinement, especially given Turan’s reputation for “defining noses.”

Hoping for a stronger, more masculine profile, he underwent his first revision with Turan, who opted to use cadaver cartilage. Unfortunately, the long-term result included a collapsed supratip and an amorphous, undefined nasal tip.

To make matters worse, Turan performed an unconsented alarplasty, further narrowing the patient’s nostrils and leaving him with a nose that feels disharmonious with his facial features. After seeking multiple consultations, he has now been advised that he’ll need another revision—this time using his own rib again—to try to restore structure and balance.

Patient 14

The patient experienced significant regret and disappointment following rhinoplasty with Dr. Turan. Initially reassured by Turan's reputation and the pre-operative simulation, the patient believed their aesthetic goals were well understood. However, the actual surgical result differed noticeably from what was discussed. Around 6 months post-op, the patient developed a visible depression in the mid-vault area, consistent with saddling.

When concerns were raised, the patient felt dismissed and unsupported. Rather than acknowledging the complication, Dr. Turan reportedly placed blame on the patient and did not provide a constructive path forward. This lack of accountability was especially troubling, as the patient believed the issue stemmed from overconfidence and insufficient experience with complex cases.

The experience had a profound emotional impact. The patient described feelings of isolation and distress, particularly as they had hoped the surgery would provide improvement rather than create new issues. Over time, they came to believe that the surgical approach lacked customization, with results often following a fixed aesthetic regardless of individual anatomy. The patient ultimately viewed their case as a cautionary example of the risks of relying on curated reputations and emphasized the need for surgeon accountability.

Patient 15

Male patient reported that while their table photos looked promising, the actual healing outcome was poor, leaving them with a crooked nose that had not been crooked before. They also stated that Dr. Turan’s revision policy was misleading, as he insisted on an unnecessary blepharoplasty, which other surgeons deemed unwarranted.

Patient 16

One patient shared her deep disappointment following rhinoplasty with Dr. Selim Turan, despite initially being impressed by his online presence and positive reviews. Though the surgery itself seemed to go smoothly, complications became evident shortly after. The patient developed persistent swelling, nostril asymmetry, and a visible depression on the left side of her nose that persisted a year post OP. She also reported discomfort and the sensation that something inside her nose wasn’t positioned correctly, which suggested a poor surgical outcome.

What stood out most was Dr. Turan’s lack of involvement in the post-operative process. After being discharged, according to her account, Turan did not check in, offer follow-up appointments, or respond meaningfully to concerns. The patient felt abandoned during a critical recovery period, which may have contributed to the unresolved swelling and complications.

This experience reflects a pattern of neglectful post-op care and a dismissive approach to patient concerns.

Patient 17

The patient experienced multiple complications following rhinoplasty with Dr. Turan and expressed significant dissatisfaction with both the outcome and the aftercare. One of the main concerns was a visible deviation and asymmetry in the nasal bridge, which the patient believed resembled a collapsed nasal wall rather than typical post-operative swelling. Additionally, the internal structure of the nose appeared uneven and abnormal to the patient, and these issues did not improve over time.

The patient also reported that one nostril had difficulty healing and had previously been infected. Despite having invested a considerable amount in the procedure, the patient felt dismissed when raising concerns. They described being given superficial advice, such as wearing a nasal retainer for a longer period, which conflicted with guidance from another medical professional. The patient felt this approach failed to address underlying structural issues, particularly those caused by internal sutures.

Emotionally, the experience was highly distressing. The patient shared feelings of frustration, helplessness, and disappointment, noting the emotional toll of spending a substantial sum on a result they found unsatisfactory. Efforts to receive timely support while still in the country were unsuccessful, and they were advised to wait, which they felt only worsened the healing process. Overall, the patient expressed a strong sense of being neglected in both communication and care and questioned whether their outcome was truly prioritized.

Patient 18

A patient from France expressed disappointment after undergoing two surgeries with Dr. Selim Turan. While they does not blame him for an infection that occurred during the first procedure, they made it clear before the second surgery that they did not want to proceed unless he was confident in achieving a better outcome.

Dr. Turan assured them he would do his best, but the second result fell far short of expectations. Despite maintaining a professional tone and accurate follow-up, the surgical skill did not meet the promised standard.

Based on their experience, the patient stated they would not recommend Dr. Selim Turan.

Patient 19

The patient's nose, which was already deviated before surgery, is now even more noticeably crooked. Their breathing has worsened, and they have very asymmetric nostrils, even though their nostrils were symmetric before. Both side profiles now look different due to the deviation.

The worst part for the patient has been the effect on their breathing. While their breathing wasn't perfect before (due to the deviated septum), it has now become a huge struggle, especially when it comes to sleeping and physical activity. The patient has to tape their mouth shut every night just to avoid dry mouth from breathing through it. Physical activities like fitness and dancing, which used to be part of their daily routine, have become much more difficult due to the limited airflow. It has been deeply depressing.

The patient's first night in the hospital was an absolute nightmare. The nurse was clearly unkind and treated them with disdain. When the patient needed help cleaning the blood from their nose, the nurse intentionally took a long time to assist, causing blood to get all over the patient's face and body. When they needed help to go to the toilet, the nurse left the room after the patient entered the bathroom. The patient ended up collapsing and losing consciousness when trying to return to their bed, without even being able to cry out for help. It was a very traumatic experience. Thankfully, a receptionist noticed and helped them.

On top of that, the surgeon pushed the patient to get lip and chin fillers, even though they never requested them, which felt extremely unprofessional.

When the patient later reached out to the surgeon about their nose looking crooked, the surgeon claimed it was just swelling and advised them to "keep massaging it." When the patient requested their before pictures, the surgeon completely ignored them.

The patient would not recommend this surgeon to anyone. The experience, both during the surgery and the post-operative care, was disheartening, and the results have only caused more issues than before.